No War In Iran

These days, I am thinking and writing about US policy against Iran . This question is serious now that Iran is the next ?

Yesterday, I shared the below idea with the Iranian NGOs. I wrote them:
"I would like to suggest Iranian NGOs 's contribution against Bush administration. My specific recommendation is campaign by writing letters to the General Assembly. The language of letters is not important. It can be Persian or English but its important to have a specific sign to show that the letters are for campaign against war in Iran. As an example this sign can be NO WAR IN IRAN. Its better to post the letters to the General Assembly. I will share this idea with the National Post and ask for special facilitations in the post offices for those who wants to participate in the campaign."

I really cant find any respond to this question that who gives this leadership to fight against terrorism through intervention and deny other nation’s rights to Bush? 11 September and being victim of terrorism ? So many other nations who are the real victims of terrorism should take gun and start fighting against terrorism by war and more violence .

Some times I am thinking this story with its characters and elements such as : 11 September, Afghanistan, Ben Laden, Iraq, Bush, Sadam, Baler and now Iran is like a global theater, few people are the main players and the rest have to watch and wish that the dark story will finish soon.

Just like most people I believe that negotiation is the only way to solve this conflict and European Union has a wonderful capacity to play more active role in the negotiation. Although, I think mostly EU talks behalf of the State’s interests.

You know my problem is since US believes itself as a superpower, as an international leader, it wants to apply its logic to whole of the world. This logic is really simple. The countries who accept State's leadership and power are friends , the countries who don't are hostile. I really have a big question. How we as people who wants peace can limit this free exercise of power by US. I'm sure US, Great Britain, Israel, China, North Korea, Pakistan, etc are unclear arms not only for humanitarian goals but also for hostile goals. What's difference between Israel and Iran? Pakistan and Iran? This question is simple because its really true. Of course, even with this official statement of North Korea (The Washington Post reports that : North Korea ...announced for the first time that it has nuclear arms and rejected moves to restart disarmament talks anytime soon, saying it needs the weapons as protection against an increasingly hostile United States.) US wont forget about Iran. They call Iran the eye of Middle-East. Just imagine Afghanistan , Iraq and Know Iran. The other countries in Middle-East are with States. Look at Saudi Arabia, There is no problem with them. Iran always has had a specific and strategic situation for States.

There is a strong stereotype among Iranian mass society that all of policies, reforms, changes in political atmosphere are happening by will of State and UK in Iran . It's a belief of normal people. You can hear it from people who are living in the villages. It’s a stereotype but it can draw for you how US and UK interventions during the recent history of Iran have made this strong belief for people.

And...I'm so worry about my country. We are tired from war and revolution . We need reforms but bottom-up reforms by Iranian people and local mechanisims.

We don't want democracy by US army.